A Proposed Bill Would Reduce Florida Builders’ Risk of Being Sued

March 30th, 2015 by Editor

If defects are found with construction more than seven years from its completion, should the builder still be liable for damages? Florida House Rep. Jay Fant doesn’t think so.

Representative Jay Fant's bill would reduce builders' liability limit from 10 years to seven.

Florida House Rep.Jay Fant’s bill would reduce builders’ liability limit from 10 years to seven.

The Republican lawmaker from Jacksonville has introduced a bill that reduces builder liability exposure from 10 years to seven years after a job is finished. This would include any defect in the design, planning or construction of an improvement to a property.

The state brought the liability limit from 15 to 10 years in 2006, but Fant says that’s not good enough given the obscure date on which the timing starts.

“Especially when public entities are involved, this can push the timetable out further and further,” Fant said during a publicly televised debate. “Contractors are facing litigation for not just a 10-year period from the end of the construction period, but really, 10, 11 or 12, depending on what the nature of the entities involved are.”

According to the current bill, the timeline starts after the latest of these dates:

  • The date of actual possession by the owner;
  • The date of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy;
  • The date of abandonment of construction if not completed; or
  • The date of completion or termination between the professional engineer, registered architect or licensed contractor and his or her employer.

Fant explained that defects that show up after seven years are largely due to a lack of maintenance.

Fred Dudley, a representative of the Association of Construction Consumers, spoke in opposition to the bill.

“This is not about blatant construction defects,” he said. “This is about hidden defects,” or ones that appear due to water damage or other occurrences.

“When we all supported this in 2006, it was because most states were at 10 years,” he said, explaining that contractors would build their buildings to only last seven if the new bill passes.

Richard Watson of the Association of Builders and Contractors followed Fred Dudley with comments in support of the bill.

“Twenty states have seven or less years in the statute of oppose,” he said. “We think this bill brings us more in line with the other states. What contractors need is certainty.”

Watson said seven years was more than enough time for problems to be identified. “If there’s going to be a problem with construction, it will manifest in the first couple of years,” he said, adding that some lawsuits are filed just to make money. “With the downturn in the economy, we’re seeing a surge in lawsuits.”

What’s your opinion? Is seven years fair? Leave a comment below.

This article is from Door and Window Market [DWM] magazine's free e-newsletter that covers the latest door and window industry news. Click HERE to sign up—there is no charge. Interested in a deeper dive? Free subscriptions to [DWM] magazine in print or digital format are available. Subscribe at no charge HERE.

Tags: , , ,

Leave Comment